Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Berlin reactivator¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Angle¾¾ 2±Þ 1·ù ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÇ Ä¡Ç迹

A CASE REPORT ON TREATMENT OF ANGLE'S CLASS ¥± DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION BY BERLIN REACTIVATOR

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1988³â 15±Ç 1È£ p.185 ~ 191
À±¿µ¼ö, ±èÁö¿µ, ±è¿ë³²,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±¿µ¼ö (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁö¿µ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿ë³² (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¼­¾ð
¾Ç±â´É ±³Á¤ÀåÄ¡´Â ¼ºÀåÁß¿¡ ÀÖ´Â ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ¾È¸é°ñ°Ý(Condylar and sutural area)¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ»
¹ÌÄ¥ »Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Ä¡¾Æ ¹× Ä¡Á¶°ñ ºÎÀ§¿¡µµ ±³Á¤·ÂÀ» ¹ßÈÖÇÏ´Â ÀåÄ¡·Î½á ÀÚ¿¬ÀûÀÎ ±â´É·Â
(functional force)À» À¯µµ, Àü´Þ, Á¦°ÅÇÏ´Â ±âÀü¿¡ ÀÇÇؼ­ ±× È¿°ú¸¦ ¹ßÈÖÇÑ´Ù.
ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °¡Ã¶¼º ±³Á¤ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ ¹ß´ÞÀº 1879³â¿¡ kingsley°¡ 'inclined bite plane'À» °í¾ÈÇÏ¿©
°úµµÇÏ°Ô ÈĹ濡 À§Ä¡ÇÑ ÇϾÇÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ ÇϾǰñÀÇ Àü¹æÀÌ µ¿À̳ª 'Jumping the bite'À» ½Ã
µµÇÑ ÀÌ·¡·Î Pierre RobinsÀº 'Monoblock'À», AndresenÀº 'Biomechanical working
retainer'¸¦ °í¾ÈÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ƯÈ÷ AndreasenÀº Hauple°ú ÇÔ²² ÀÚ½ÅÀÌ °í¾ÈÇÑ ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ¿¬±¸ÇÑ
°á°ú ±Ù·ÂÀ» activate ½ÃÅ°´Â ´É·ÂÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ÇÏ¿© 'Activator'¶õ ¸íĪÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¶ÇÇÑ
À̵éÀº 1936³â FKO(Functions Kiefer Orthopedie)¶ó ±×ÈÄ Bimler´Â ¡¸Bimler appliance¡¹¸¦
Stockfish´Â ¡¸kinetor¡¹¸¦ Balters´Â ¡¸bionato¡¹r¸¦ °í¾ÈÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ±×ÈÄ¿¡µµ °è¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î º¯Çü °³¹ßµÇ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The patient, 8 years 9 months old male, complained of protrusion of upper anterior
teeth. As a result of clinical examination and cephalometric analysis, it was revealed
forward relationship in maxilla, but normal in mandible.
This patient was treated with Berlin reactivator combined with extraoral headgear.
After 9 months, the following results were obtained :
1. Canine and molar relationship was improved.
2. The overjet was somewhat improved.
3. Forward maxillary growth was inhibited.
4. Relations of the upper and lower jaws (ANB difference) were improved.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI